Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical OncologyRandomized Controlled Trial - Multicenter Study
20 Feb 2025
To evaluate the survival benefit of chemotherapy intensification in older patients with AML who have not achieved a measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission.
Five hundred twenty-three patients with AML (median age, 67 years; range, 51-79) without a flow cytometric MRD-negative remission response after a first course of daunorubicin and AraC (DA; including 165 not in remission) were randomly assigned between up to two further courses of DA or intensified chemotherapy-either fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida) or DA with cladribine (DAC).
Overall survival (OS) was not improved in the intensification arms (DAC DA: hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.01]; = .054; FLAG-Ida DA: HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.12]; = .270); OS at 3 years was 34%, 46%, and 42% for DA, DAC, and FLAG-Ida, respectively. Early deaths and other adverse events were more frequent with FLAG-Ida (9% day 60 deaths 4% after DA or DAC; = .032). Of patients entering random assignment, 131 had MRD unknown status. In this subgroup of patients lacking evidence of residual leukemia by flow cytometry, there was no detectable survival advantage from intensification. A planned sensitivity analysis excluding these patients demonstrated a survival benefit for both DAC (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.93]; = .018) and FLAG-Ida (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.98]; = .035); OS at 3 years was 30%, 46%, and 46% for DA, DAC, and FLAG-Ida, respectively. There was a concordant reduction in relapse (DAC DA: HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.98]; = .039; FLAG-Ida DA: HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99]; = .042). DAC benefit was maintained when survival was censored for transplant ( = .042).
In this study of older patients with AML considered fit and with evidence of residual disease after first induction, chemotherapy intensification improved survival. DAC intensification was better tolerated than FLAG-Ida.
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan 10;43(2):239. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-02577.
The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/authors/author-center. Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).
More resources:
Share: