The effect of stand-alone and additional preoperative video education on patients' knowledge of anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial.

Background

Fully digital preoperative information could save valuable time and resources. However, compared with face to face consultations, equivalent levels of safety, patient satisfaction and participation need to be maintained when using other methods to inform patients. This trial compared knowledge retention between preoperative stand-alone video education and face-to-face education by an anaesthesiologist.

Objectives

To assess if video education, alone or combined with face-to-face education, leads to better knowledge retention more than conventional face-to-face education.

Design

A randomised controlled trial with four arms: Video, Anaesthesiologist, Video & Anaesthesiologist, and Reference for baseline measurements and exploration of a test-enhanced learning effect.

Setting

A Dutch tertiary care centre from February 2022 to February 2023.

Patients

A total of 767 adult patients undergoing preoperative consultation for elective non-cardiothoracic surgery, with 677 included in the complete case analysis.

Interventions

Stand-alone preoperative video education and video education in combination with face-to-face education in the preoperative outpatient clinic.

Main outcome measures

Primary outcome, measured by the Rotterdam Anaesthesia Knowledge Questionnaire, was knowledge retention on day 0. Secondary outcomes included knowledge retention at 14 and 42 days, preoperative anxiety, and the need for additional information using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale. Other outcomes were satisfaction, self-assessed knowledge, and test-enhanced learning effect.

Results

Stand-alone video education led to higher Rotterdam Anaesthesia Knowledge Questionnaire scores than face-to-face education on day 0: median [IQR], 87.5 [81.3 to 93.8] vs. 81.3 [68.8 to 87.5], P < 0.001. Combined education in the "Video & Anaesthesiologist" group led to better knowledge retention compared with both the "Anaesthesiologist" group and the Video group: 93.8 [87.5 to 93.8] vs. 81.3 [68.8 to 87.5], P < 0.001; 93.8 [87.5 to 93.8] vs. 87.5 [81.3 to 93.8], P = 0.01, respectively. No differences in the patients' preoperative anxiety and satisfaction levels were found.

Conclusion

Compared with face-to-face education by an anaesthesiologist, stand-alone video and combined video education improve short-term knowledge retention, without increasing patient anxiety.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05188547 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05188547).

References:

• Blitz JD, Kendale SM, Jain SK, et al. Preoperative evaluation clinic visit is associated with decreased risk of in-hospital postoperative mortality. Anesthesiology 2016; 125:280–294.
• van Hoorn BT, Tromp DJ, van Rees RCM, et al. Effectiveness of a digital vs face-to-face preoperative assessment: a randomized, noninferiority clinical trial. J Clin Anesth 2023; 90:111192.
• van den Blink A, Janssen LMJ, Hermanides J, et al. Evaluation of electronic screening in the preoperative process. J Clin Anesth 2022; 82:110941.
• Zhang K, Rashid-Kolvear M, Waseem R, et al. Virtual preoperative assessment in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2021; 75:110540.
• Gibas G, Liebisch M, Eichenberg C, et al. Preoperative anxiety after face-to-face patient assessment versus preanaesthesia telemedicine (PANTEM) in adults: a randomised clinical trial. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 2024; 174:133–139.